ET Williams

The Doctor of Common Sense

Blog

by

Common Sense of Relationships, Men can’t understand women

Men and Women are Just Difference

Response to Jenna Marbles Things Boys Don\’t Understand 

Men and Women are just different and we will never truly understand
one another. Some women don’t see the common sense behind men getting so
excited when they are watching sports. Just as men can’t understand why women
get so excited about their 15 pair of black shoes. We are not just from Venus
and Mars we are in a different dimension on many occasions.

We should just accept the difference and move on with our
lives. Please men don’t tell me that you understand every aspect of your woman
because you are simply lying to yourself. And women please stop using your man as
your project. He is not Ken from Barbie. You can’t just dress him up and put
him in your little make believe world.

When your woman has a hard day and she wants to discuss that
day with you once she comes home. She does not want you playing Dr. Phil she
simply wants you to nod and occasionally say wow! Or what are you going to do
about that? You can even say “I can’t believe she did that”, which she will
response by saying, “I know she has some nerves.”

Women don’t want you solving their problem they just want
you to play the therapist and just listen. However women men are different when
it comes to talking. They usually have used all of their words up when they
come home, so when you ask the man how is day was. He may say it was alright.
Please don’t be offended or take it personally he is just all out of worlds.

by

A Response To Jenna Marbles "Why Girls hate each others.

 

 

Response to Jenna Marbles Why Girls Hate Each Other

 

Women can be so catty when it comes to receiving attention from the opposite sex. Yes common sense is out the window because they must be the HCIC (Head Chicken In Charge). They mark out their turf like cats do when a new cat comes over. They make believe that the other woman has committed some unpardonable sin against mankind.  Check out the video which is a response to Jenna Marbles “Why Girls Hate each”.

by

Muslim Chokes Atheist because he was Offended

Muslim Chokes Atheist because he was Offended

A Muslim judge in Pennsylvania – who scolded a local atheist for offending Islam, called him a doofus and accused him of “using the First Amendment” to madden Muslims – dismissed harassment charges against the Muslim defendant who purportedly choked the atheist during a Halloween parade.

 District Judge Mark Martin brought a Quran to court and told the alleged victim, American Atheists’ Pennsylvania State Director Ernest Perce V, “I think you misinterpreted a couple of things. So before you start mocking somebody else’s religion, you might want to find out a little more about it. It kind of makes you look like a doofus.”

The judge added, “I think our forefathers intended to use the First Amendment so we can speak with our mind, not to p— off other people and cultures – which is what you did.”

 Perce had worn a “zombie Muhammad” costume and proclaimed that he was the Prophet Muhammad risen from the dead at the Oct, 11, 2011, event in Mechanicsburg, Pa. A “zombie pope” was also featured in the parade that night.

 Now the Scranton Atheism Examiner reports that Perce could be arrested for posting audio of the judge scolding him for mocking Muhammad. According to report, the Muslim judge has threatened to hold him in contempt of court for releasing the recording. Perce has claimed he was given permission to post the audio.

 The Examiner reports that Perce said he posted the audio because the judge treated him unfairly and showed preferential treatment for the Muslim defendant.

 According to reports, the atheists were marching when Talaag Elbayomy, a Muslim, stormed out of the crowd and assaulted Perce, grabbing a sign around his neck and pulling until the strings choked him.

 The men caught the attention of a nearby police officer.

 Mechanicsburg Police Officer Bryan Curtis told Pennsylvania’s WHTM-TV, “Mr. Perce has the right to do what he did that evening, and the defendant in this case was wrong in what he did in confronting him.”

 He added, “I believe that I brought a case that showed proof beyond a reasonable doubt, and the case was dismissed, and I was disappointed.”

 Elbayomy – who said he believed it was illegal to mock Muhammad – was charged with harassment. He denied touching Perce at trial, but Officer Curtis said Elbayomy admitted grabbing Perce’s sign and beard the night of the incident.

 http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/atheist-choked-by-muslim-and-then/

by

Obama Indoctrination of Kids in Houston School

Obama Indoctrination of Kids in Houston School

KTRH – Houston) — Cy-Fair school officials have pulled what some consider a pro-Obama poem from next week’s Black History Month program at Tipps Elementary.  This after a parent complained it was too political for his daughter’s kindergarten class.

Along with the poem mailed home to parents was an internal memo which read:

“Attached is a chant about President Barack Obama. All Kindergarteners will be required to learn the chant for the Black History program.”

 Parent Joseph Beaver tells KTRH News he doesn’t believe the poem provides any educational value to students.

 “You’re not learning anything from it,” he says.  “I can’t sit there and say in 20 years I’m going to need to know his favorite baseball team was this.  That’s just useless information.”

However, Sylvester Brown at Houston’s Black Heritage Society believes the whole thing is being taken out of context.

 “Is the teacher using it to express her views?” asks Brown.  “I don’t think you can look at it from that side unless you’re specifically looking for something to complain about.”

  Brown points out it this is Black History Month and Presidents’ Day just passed, and Obama is our first black president.

 “If they just sung a song about George Washington in class, would they say the same thing that’s political?” he asks.  “I mean, where’s the contrast?”

 Beaver still disagrees.

 “The ‘cherry tree,’ that teaches morals about trying to tell the truth,” he says.  “This poem didn’t teach anything.  As a public school system you need to educate people, not teach them little chants and stuff.”

 Beaver first voiced his concerns to radio host Joe Pagliarulo on KTRH sister station KPRC.  And Gayle Fallon, president of Houston’s teachers union says he was right to do so.

 “Just like you couldn’t put something out advocating a specific religion, you can’t with politics either,” she says.

 The Cy-Fair teachers union wouldn’t comment, but Fallon says the poem and attached memo never should have been mailed to parents, somebody in the school’s administration missed it.

 “If the poem is overtly partisan political which it sounds like, they have a problem,” he says.  “If it was just saying we’re having a black history program, it probably would not be a problem.”

 Cy-Fair ISD officials admit the poem was sent to parents without administrative approval, and the teacher has since apologized.

 Assistant Superintendent Kelli Durham issued KTRH News a statement saying:

 “There has been a misunderstanding circulating about kindergarten teachers requiring students to recite a chant at Tipps. This resulted when a teacher inadvertently attached a note, intended for other teachers, to a parent communication that was sent home. A teacher reading the note would understand the inference: only kindergarten students whose parents wanted them to participate were “required” to learn a chant.

 However, the chant selected by the kindergarten team of teachers was sent home prior to receiving principal approval. Seeking approval is a school practice for school programs and events. After the principal reviewed the poem, along with the selections that would be performed by students at other grade levels, she selected another activity recognizing President Obama –kindergarten’s historical figure to recognize.

 Last week, the count for participants was less than 150 students compared to school wide enrollment of more than 1,000 students, and of those 25 were kindergarten students.”

http://www.wtam.com/cc-common/news/sections/newsarticle.html?feed=104707&article=9802315

 

by

FBI Apologies for Muslim Being Terrorist

New FBI Agents and the Criminals are Really Scared of New FBI Agents
New FBI Agents and the Criminals are Really Scared of New FBI Agents

 

The FBI has removed hundreds of counterterrorism training documents after a months-long review found inaccuracies and other problems in their description of Muslims.

 The review was triggered after a September blog in wired magazine revealed training documents that reportedly called the Prophet Muhammad a “cult leader,” claimed “devout” Muslims have been generally violent for hundreds of years and made other controversial statements.

 The FBI did not get into details about which documents were taken out, but a law enforcement source confirmed to Fox News on Tuesday that hundreds were removed because they were deemed “not consistent with the highest professional standards and the FBI’s core values.”

The results of the review were announced during a meeting earlier this month that included FBI Director Robert Mueller.

 The pages which were removed fell into at least one of four categories — “poor taste,” using Arab or Muslim “stereotypes,” information missing “precision,” and “factual errors.”

 Despite the outcome, the FBI maintained that the bulk of its training materials is up to FBI standards. Less than 1 percent of the 160,000 training material pages was removed, FBI spokesman Christopher Allen said. The review covered documents dating back to Sept. 11, 2001, which were used in training courses for new agents, continuing education courses for others and presentations to groups.

 “As a result of that review, we found that the overwhelming majority of our counterterrorism training materials met the FBI’s standards,” Allen said in a statement.

 Allen described the review as “comprehensive,” and said the bureau is developing new guidelines that will govern “future training.”

Allen also said the FBI has been communicating with advocacy groups since the beginning of the review process to explain what happened and what “corrective actions” would be taken.

 “The Muslim American community is an essential partner in our efforts not only to prevent terrorism, but to address other crime concerns that affect communities, including the protection of civil rights,” Allen said.

 The Wired article detailed, among other materials, a presentation that included a graph that tracked followers of the Bible, Torah and Koran over hundreds of years. It showed “devout” followers of the Torah and the Bible becoming less violent over time, while “devout” followers of the Koran remaining as violent in 2010 as they were hundreds of years ago.

One concern was that the documents played into al Qaeda propaganda that America was battling Islam as a whole, and not just radical Muslim extremists.

“It’s counterproductive to our counterterrorism work,” Salam al-Marayati, president of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, told FoxNews.com. “It’s not effective counterterrorism policy to be at war with the whole religion or any religion.”

Al-Marayati, whose group attended the most recent meeting with Mueller, urged the bureau to seek more “feedback” in the future when developing its training guidelines on any group.

President Obama, shortly after taking office, declared in Turkey that the United States is “not at war with Islam.”

 However, the Obama administration has since come under criticism from some members of Congress for omitting mention entirely of radical Islam in its counterterrorism materials.

 A strategic plan on homegrown terror released in December did not use the term radical Islam once, though it did discuss Al Qaeda and those groups inspired by it. A Defense Department letter in October also classified the Fort Hood massacre as “workplace violence.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/02/21/fbi-purges-hundreds-training-documents-after-probe-on-treatment-islam/

by

More Corrupt Politicians Involved in Cronyism

Organized crimes are not a crime when you work for the government

Rogers, the CEO of Duke Energy Corp., one of the largest
utility corporations in the country, has given generously to Democratic
politicians over the years. Along with his wife, Mary Anne, he has contributed
more than $210,000 to Democratic candidates and committees since 2008, more
than double what the couple has given to Republicans. Of that figure, more than
$150,000 went to the Democratic National Committee (DNC); $19,200 went to
President Obama.

Rogers is co-chairing the host committee with Charlotte
Mayor Anthony Foxx (D), who was elected to a second term in November 2011.
Rogers and his wife both contributed $8,000 to Foxx’s campaign, the maximum
allowed under state law.

Rogers has also done his part to make sure that the
convention has access to plenty of cash. The Charlotte Observer reported that
Rogers was “quietly raising” as much as $15 million for the DNC.

Additionally, in an effort to entice the DNC to Charlotte,
Rogers and Duke Energy offered to open a $10 million line of credit—guaranteed
by Duke shareholders—to help finance the convention.

Duke spokesman Tom Williams told the Washington Free Beacon
that the offer of credit was made in the hopes of strengthening Charlotte’s
application. “It’s all part of our effort to showcase the city of Charlotte,”
Williams said. “Nothing more, nothing less.”

Asked if the credit line had been utilized, a host committee
official replied, “not to my knowledge,” adding, “In theory, we raise the $36.6
million. The line of credit is just that. We’re obligated to pay it all back.”

Meanwhile, organizers of the Republican National Convention
in Tampa, Fla., say they don’t anticipate needing a line of credit.

“There’s a tremendous amount of enthusiasm and support for
the 2012 Republican National Convention,” said convention spokesman James
Davis. “Therefore, we have no credit lines in place or plans to borrow money.”

Just as Rogers has helped fund Democratic politicians, they,
in turn, have helped steer massive amounts of federal funding to Duke Energy.
The 2009 stimulus package, for instance, was a boon for the company: Duke
received federal grants totaling $230.4 million for a number of “green” energy
projects including “smart grid” development and wind energy storage.

According to Recovery.gov, Duke created 196.6 jobs as a
result of the grants.

The company also received a $350,000 grant to assist General
Motors in the development of the Chevrolet Volt, the poorly selling electric
vehicle that the Obama administration has recently proposed subsidizing at a
rate of $10,000 per car.

Rogers’ support for the president’s “green” agenda earned
him a spot on the short list to become President Obama’s Energy Secretary.

Though headquartered in Charlotte, Duke maintains an active
presence in Washington, D.C., having spent more than $26 million lobbying the
federal government on energy-related issues since 2007.

In 2009, the company enlisted the services of the Podesta
Group, a lobbying firm founded by John Podesta, the former president of the
Center for American Progress and co-chairman of the Obama-Biden transition
team, and his brother Tony Podesta. Since then, Duke Energy has paid the firm
$860,000 to lobby to “support the passage of climate change and energy
legislation” and “energy efficiency and clean energy solutions,” according to a
database maintained by the Senate Office of Public Records.

The Duke Energy
Political Action Committee, which has tended to give more to Republicans in the
past, reversed that trend in 2010, giving $260,000 to Democratic candidates
following the passage of the stimulus, compared with just $209,000 to
Republicans.

The Washington Free Beacon noted last week that the
convention host-committee is operating under very strict fundraising
restrictions, refusing to accept money from corporations, lobbyists, or other
special interest groups such as unions.

However, these self-imposed restrictions did not prevent
Rogers from accompanying convention CEO Steve Kerrigan, a former national
political director for Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.), to Washington, D.C. for a
meeting with high-powered lobbyists.

Bloomberg reported that Rogers and Kerrigan were touting an
array of expensive convention “packages,” including premium hotels rooms and
concierge service, aimed at ultra-wealthy donors. A convention spokesperson
said they were simply “educating Beltway types about the new rules.”

The host committee has been charged with raising $36.6
million to help cover a portion of the convention costs. Given the new restrictions,
including a $100,000 limitation on individual donations, the goal will be
difficult to reach.

For instance, of the $61 million the DNC raised for its 2008
convention in Denver, Colo., more than 70 percent came from donations of
$250,000 or higher. Nearly a quarter of the convention’s funding came from just
12 donations of more than $1 million. Union groups alone gave $8.3 million (14
percent). Contributions of $100,000 or less—this year’s limit—accounted for
only 5 percent of the total.

It is unclear whether the host committee is having trouble
meeting its fundraising target. A committee official told the Free Beacon there
were no plans to publicly release fundraising figures before the FEC-mandated
deadline of one month following the convention.

http://freebeacon.com/democratic-national-cronyism/