• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Store
  • Videos
  • Breaking News
  • Articles
  • Contact

ET Williams

The Doctor of Common Sense

Blog

03/14/2017 by The Doctor Of Common Sense

Factory Robots Responsible for Killing an Employee

 

 

A rogue robot has been blamed for the death of a woman killed in an accident at an auto-parts factory in Michigan.

Wanda Holbrook, who worked as a maintenance technician at the Ventra Ionia Mains plant for 12 years, was “trapped by robotic machinery and pronounced dead at the scene” in July 2015.

The 57-year-old’s widower, William Holbrook, has filed a wrongful death complaint seeking damages from five robotics companies responsible for manufacturing, installing and testing the robotics: Lincoln Electric, Flex-N-Gate, Prodomax, FANUC and Nachi.

“Wanda was working in either section 140 or 150 within the ‘100’ cell, when a robot from section 130 took Wanda by surprise, entering the section she was working,” the lawsuit alleges.

She “suffered tremendous fright, shock and conscious pain and suffering” when she was crushed to death, the suit claims.

“The robot from section 130 should have never entered section 140, and should have never attempted to load a hitch assembly within a fixture that was already loaded with a hitch assembly.

“A failure of one or more of defendants’ safety systems or devices had taken place, causing Wanda’s death.”

Lincoln Electric, FANUC and Nachi have been named in two additional claims of product liability and breach of implied warranty, Quartz notes.

In her role, Ms Holbrook performed maintenance duties on robots which required occasional inspection.

Holbrook v Prodomax Automation Ltd, et al, is currently awaiting trial.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2017/03/14/rogue-factory-robot-blamed-death-human-colleague/

 

 

 

 

 

Filed Under: Murder Tagged With: robots

03/14/2017 by The Doctor Of Common Sense

John McCain and Paul Ryan want to save Obamacare?!

A civil war has started between patriots and neocons in government, says radio host Dr. Michael Savage.

“It’s a civil war. Who’s winning though is the question,” Savage said on The Alex Jones Show Tuesday. “We elected the President, we allegedly own the Senate, we have the House, and we’re getting nothing done. No tax cuts, not a brick laid for the wall. What’s been done?”

 

The immediate threat to President Trump’s America First agenda is the neocon wing of Republican Party like Speaker Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell, Savage noted.

“Because they’re obstructionists, as you know,” he said. “The left wing of the Republican Party is impeding Donald Trump at every turn. The left wing of the Republican Party is the Democrat Party, is the Socialist Party USA, it’s all one.”

“They don’t care about borders, language, or culture,” he continued. “All they care about it feathering their own nests and feathering the military-industrial complex with another endless war.”

The “fake conservatives in the media” should also realize that, unlike Hillary Clinton, Trump actually supports the First and Second amendment, Savage said.

 

“Why are these people stabbing Trump in the back?” he asked.

Establishment Republicans like Ryan are pressuring Trump to “compromise” on the upcoming healthcare legislation, but the problem is that healthcare is too big of an issue to compromise with neocons on.

“One of the signature pieces of the [Trump] campaign was ‘we’re going to repeal Obamacare,’ right?” Savage asked.

Ryan recently warned Congress that “the system is going to collapse” if they don’t unite to pass his American Health Care Act bill.

The remarks were directed not just towards Democrats but also to conservatives like Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) who say the bill is simply watered down Obamacare.

“The House leadership plan is Obamacare Lite,” Paul tweeted. “It will not pass. Conservatives are not going to take it. #FullRepeal.”

Savage: GOP Traitors Blocking Trump

Filed Under: Politics, Trump Administration Tagged With: Obamacare

03/13/2017 by The Doctor Of Common Sense

Snoop Dogg Assassinates Trump in Recent Rap Video

Snoop Dogg recently jumped on a rework of BADBADNOTGOOD and Kaytranada’s IV single “Lavender.” Snoop stars alongside a cast of clowns (including one played by Michael Rapaport) in the track’s new video, directed by Jesse Wellens and James DeFina. Watch it below. Of the clip, in which a Donald Trump parody reigns supreme—at one point announcing the deportation of all dogs—Snoop told Billboard, “Nobody’s dealing with the real issue with this f–king clown as president, and the shit that we dealing with out here, so I wanted to take time out to push pause on a party record and make one of these records for the time being.” In a climactic scene, Snoop pulls a gun on the Trump clown in a parking lot; later, a chain-bound Trump tries in vain to join Snoop and his accomplice in smoking a blunt. Read Snoop’s elaboration on the song and video concept below, via Billboard.

The ban that this motherf–ker tried to put up; him winning the presidency; police being able to kill motherf–kers and get away with it; people being in jail for weed for 20, 30 years and motherf–kers that’s not black on the streets making money off of it — but if you got color or ethnicity connected to your name, you’ve been wrongfully accused or locked up for it, and then you watching people not of color position themselves to get millions and billions off of it. It’s a lot of clown sh-t going on that we could just sit and talk on the phone all day about, but it’s a few issues that we really wanted to lock into [for the video] like police, the president and just life in general.

 

http://pitchfork.com/news/69223-snoop-dogg-pulls-gun-on-fucking-clown-trump-in-new-lavender-video-watch/

Filed Under: Anti-Trump Crowd, Donald Trump Tagged With: music, rap

03/13/2017 by The Doctor Of Common Sense

Consumers are becoming more Food Conscious

 

Republican and Democratic lawmakers on Sunday said they still haven’t seen evidence to support President Donald Trump’s unverified claim that his predecessor tapped his phones, but they expect the facts will soon emerge.

The comments came a day before Monday’s deadline set by the House Intelligence Committee, asking the Department of Justice to provide any documentary evidence relating to Trump’s allegation, according to ABC News and the Associated Press.

Representative Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the House panel, said on ABC’s “This Week” that he expected to see no such evidence and suggested that none existed. He said he hopes to put the matter to rest on March 20, when FBI Director James Comey is scheduled to testify before the committee.

Comey asked the Justice Department to publicly reject Trump’s claims because they’re false, the New York Times reported on March 5.

“Either the president quite deliberately for some reason made up the charge or, perhaps more disturbing, the president really believes this,” Schiff said on ABC.

Senator John McCain, an Arizona Republican, called on the president to provide proof of his allegations about former President Barack Obama, or admit he was wrong. “The president has one of two choices: either retract or to provide the information that the American people deserve,” McCain said on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

No Apology Needed

McCain said he had “no reason to believe that the charge is true” and that Trump could clear up the matter by asking the intelligence community for the facts.

Republican Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas, who sits on the Senate Intelligence Committee, also said he had “not seen that evidence” of wiretapping, but he declined to call on Trump to apologize to Obama.

“President Trump said last weekend that he wanted the intelligence committees in the Senate and the House to take up this matter as part of our broader inquiry into Russia’s activities into our political system last year,” Cotton said on “Face the Nation” on CBS. “We’re going to do exactly that.”

Special Counsel

Trump tweeted to his 26.4 million followers on March 4 that Obama had his “‘wires tapped’ in Trump Tower” prior to the election and called Obama a “bad (or sick) guy.” A spokesman for Obama called the claims “simply false,” and the former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, who left the government in January, has said there was no wiretap activity directed at Trump or his campaign by the Obama administration.

The White House hasn’t provided evidence for the claim, saying it won’t comment beyond asking the relevant congressional committees to look into the allegations as part of their probes into allegations that Russia tried to help Trump during the 2016 presidential election.

Since then, Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who recused himself from investigations related to the 2016 presidential campaign, instead told a conservative radio host on March 9 that he was open to naming a outside counsel to look into the Justice Department under Obama. On Friday, Sessions asked 46 U.S. attorneys who were appointed by Obama to resign.

For a QuickTake on the Trump-Russia saga, click here.

McCain told CNN there are “a lot of aspects” of the relationship between the Trump campaign and Russia that require more investigation.

“So far, I don’t think the American people have gotten all the answers,” McCain said. “In fact, I think there’s a lot more shoes to drop from this centipede.”

Dmitry Peskov, a spokesman for Russian President Vladimir Putin, denied during an interview that aired Sunday on CNN’s “Fareed Zakaria GPS” that the Russian government collaborated with Trump’s campaign. Russians had a natural preference for Trump because of his desire for dialogue, while Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton had been more hostile to Russia, he said.

“It’s quite natural, but that doesn’t mean, in no way, that Russia has interfered in electoral process,” Peskov said.

Trump and Putin may meet at the G20 summit in Hamburg in July if there’s no agreement on earlier talks, Peskov said.

https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-03-12/truth-of-trump-s-wiretap-claim-should-emerge-soon-lawmakers-say

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Consumerism

03/13/2017 by The Doctor Of Common Sense

U.S. Military Leak Exposes “Holy Grail” of Security Files

SF86 Application 

NEW YORK — A unsecured backup drive has exposed thousands of US Air Force documents, including highly sensitive personnel files on senior and high-ranking officers.

Security researchers found that the gigabytes of files were accessible to anyone because the internet-connected backup drive was not password protected.

The files, reviewed by ZDNet, contained a range of personal information, such as names and addresses, ranks, and Social Security numbers of more than 4,000 officers. Another file lists the security clearance levels of hundreds of other officers, some of whom possess “top secret” clearance, and access to sensitive compartmented information and codeword-level clearance.

Phone numbers and contact information of staff and their spouses, as well as other sensitive and private personal information, were found in several other spreadsheets.

The drive is understood to belong to a lieutenant colonel, whose name we are not publishing. ZDNet reached out to the officer by email but did not hear back.

The data was secured last week after a notification by MacKeeper security researcher Bob Diachenko.

Among the most damaging documents on the drive included the completed applications for renewed national security clearances for two US four-star generals, both of whom recently had top US military and NATO positions.

In an increasingly competitive environment, ideas can differentiate businesses and fuel their growth. SMBs need to get behind ideas and the people that create them. They can do that by encouraging a culture in which ideas thrive, and by giving people the tools they need to shape, share, and sell their ideas.

Surface with Windows 10 and Office 365 is empowering ideation across the globe, and giving SMBs the support they need to turn good ideas into great business. It can help you to transform your business, too.

These so-called SF86 applications contain highly sensitive and detailed information, including financial and mental health history, past convictions, relationships with foreign nationals, and other personal information.

These completed questionnaires are used to determine a candidate’s eligibility to receive classified material.

Several national security experts and former government officials we spoke to for this story described this information as the “holy grail” for foreign adversaries and spies, and said that it should not be made public.

For that reason, we are not publishing the names of the generals, who have since retired from service.

Nevertheless, numerous attempts to contact the generals over the past week went unreturned.

“Some of the questions ask for information that can be very personal, as well as embarrassing,” said Mark Zaid, a national security attorney, in an email. The form allows prospective applicants to national security positions to disclose arrests, drug and alcohol issues, or mental health concerns, among other things, said Zaid.

Completed SF86 forms aren’t classified but are closely guarded. These were the same kinds of documents that were stolen in a massive theft of sensitive files at the Office of Personnel Management, affecting more than 22 million government and military employees.

“Even if the SF86 answers are innocuous, because of the personal information within the form there is always the risk of identity theft or financial fraud that could harm the individual and potentially compromise them,” said Zaid.

One spreadsheet contained a list of officers under investigation by the military, including allegations of abuses of power and substantiated claims of wrongdoing, such as wrongfully disclosing classified information.

A former government official, who reviewed a portion of the documents but did not want to be named, said that the document, in the wrong hands, provided a “blueprint” for blackmail.

Even officers who have left in recent years may still be vulnerable to coercion if they are still trusted with historical state secrets.

“Foreign powers might use that information to target those individuals for espionage or to otherwise monitor their activity in the hopes of gaining insight into US national security posture,” said Susan Hennessey, a Brookings fellow and a former attorney at the National Security Agency.

Government officials use the form as a screening mechanism, said Hennessey, but it also offers applicants the chance to inform the government of past indiscretions or concerns that eliminate the possibility of blackmail in the future, she added. “These are people whose lives can depend on sensitive information being safeguarded, so the notion they would fail to put country over self in that kind of circumstance is far-fetched and supported by relatively few historical examples,” she said.

“Still, it is the obligation of the government to keep this kind of information safe, both in order to protect the privacy of those who serve and their families and to protect them against being placed in difficult situations unnecessarily,” said Hennessey.

Though many of the files were considered “confidential” or “sensitive,” a deeper keyword-based search of the files did not reveal any material marked as classified.

A completed passport application for one of the generals was also found in the same folder, as well as scans of his own and his wife’s passports and driving licenses.

Other data included financial disclosures, bank account and routing information, and some limited medical information.

Another document purported to show the lieutenant colonel’s username and password for a sensitive internal Dept. of Defense system, used to check staff security clearances.

Another document listed the clearance levels of one of the generals.

And, a smaller spreadsheet contained a list of Social Security numbers, passport numbers, and other contact information on high-profile figures and celebrities, including Channing Tatum.

The records were collected in relation to a six-day tour to Afghanistan by Tatum in 2015. An email to Tatum’s publicist went unreturned.

The drive also contained several gigabytes of Outlook email files, covering years worth of emails. Another document purported to be a backup.

Nevertheless, this would be the second breach of military data in recent months.

Potomac, a Dept. of Defense subcontractor, was the source of a large data exposure of military personnel files of physical and mental health support staff. Many of the victims involved in the data leak are part of the US Special Operations Command (SOCOM), which includes those both formerly employed by US military branches, such as the Army, Navy, and Air Force, and those presumably still on active deployment.

It’s not known how long the backup drive was active. Given that the device was public and searchable, it’s not known if anyone other than the security researchers accessed the files.

The Office of Personnel Management, which processes security clearance applications, referred comment to the Pentagon.

A Pentagon spokesperson would not comment in an email Monday.

http://www.zdnet.com/article/leaked-us-military-files-exposed/

Filed Under: Federal Government, Government Control Tagged With: cybersecurity, Military, national security

03/13/2017 by The Doctor Of Common Sense

China Makes it Illegal to Insult any Political Figures Associated with the Communist Party

POLITICIANS introduced amendments to China’s nascent civil code to make defaming “heroes and martyrs” of the ruling Communist Party a civil offence, as the leadership moves to strengthen its grasp on the history of the People’s Republic.

China’s ongoing National People’s Congress (NPC), an annual meeting of some 3,000 delegates, is currently debating general rules for a civil code. The rules are expected to be passed by the event’s close this Wednesday.

Delegates made 126 changes to the most recent draft of the rules, released on March 8, which will serve as a preamble to the final code, expected in 2020, state media said.
One addition is the line: “Encroaching upon the name, portrait, reputation and honour of heroes and martyrs harms the public interest, and should bear civil liability.”The deeds of revolutionary heroes and sacrifices of military martyrs are central to the Party’s legitimacy, much of which is based on claims of great historic achievements, such as defeating Japan during the Second World War.

Academics who offer different interpretations of history which downplay the role of the Party and its heroes are labelled “historical nihilists”.Chinese president Xi Jinping has emphasised the need for the party to have faith in its own version of history, pointing to the Soviet Union’s collapse as a warning to cadres about what happens if revolutionary leaders are denounced.

The Party warned last year that a flood of online information is causing people to doubt the party and urged that the party do more to rebut “wrong” points of view.

“In modern life, some people use distorted facts and discrediting libel to maliciously slander and insult the honour and reputation of heroes and martyrs… the social impact is very bad, rules should be imposed in response,” the NPC’s legal committee said on Sunday, according to a report today by the official Xinhua News Agency.Politicians also amended the previous draft so that the age at which a child is considered to be capable of civil actions is now 8 years old instead of 6 years old and moved to further protect “good Samaritans” who help in an emergency from liability if they accidentally cause harm.

Armed police soldiers lift timbers during a drill on August 24, 2016 in Chongqing, China. As the highest temperatures reached over 40 degree Celsius at 5 districts in Chongqing, officers and soldiers of an armed police crop took outdoor training

The ongoing compilation of the civil code, which will form the basis of all China’s future private law once passed, is seen by some legal reformers as a test of how far China will go in allowing civil liberties that might impinge upon state power.Lawyers have said that previous drafts of the preamble fail to make significant progress on protecting individuals from state encroachment for long-standing issues like property rights and the right to personal freedoms.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/778367/China-illrgal-law-insult-heroes-martyrs-Communist-Party

Filed Under: International Politics and News, Veterans Tagged With: army forces, China

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 247
  • Go to page 248
  • Go to page 249
  • Go to page 250
  • Go to page 251
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 336
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Articles

  • What Really Happened To Seth Rich And Is It Connected To Hillary Emails And Fake Russian Collusion?
  • Will “Big Tish” Leticia James Go To Prison For Mortgage Fraud?
  • Women Hit With A Bowling Ball
  • How Can Some Left-Wing Judge Stop President Trump From Deporting Illegals?

Donate To Free Speech

Footer


Copyright © 2025 · Workstation Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in