• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Store
  • Videos
  • Breaking News
  • Articles
  • Contact

ET Williams

The Doctor of Common Sense

Blog

07/19/2017 by The Doctor Of Common Sense

Vatican Calls American Christians ‘Ambitious Racists Who Promote Hate’

The face of evil and certainly the voice of evil. Satan’s puppet.

In a hard-hitting essay, Philadelphia Archbishop Charles Chaput has joined the dozens of Christian leaders who have denounced the ignorant and insulting article published last week by the Vatican-vetted journal, La Civiltà Cattolica.

The essay by papal confidants Father Antonio Spadaro SJ and Rev. Marcelo Figueroa paints an offensive caricature of conservative Christians in the United States as politically ambitious racists who promote an “ecumenism of hate” and long to impose a theocratic state.

In his powerful response, Archbishop Chaput says that the authors are guilty of “dumbing down and inadequately presenting the nature of Catholic/evangelical cooperation on religious freedom and other key issues.”

“Dismissing today’s attacks on religious liberty as a ‘narrative of fear,’” as the La Civiltà Cattolica article does, Chaput says, “sounds willfully ignorant.”

The redoubtable Philadelphia Archbishop joins a growing chorus of Catholic voices that have universally criticized the article. One observer, Father Raymond Desouza, derided the piece as “ignorant of contemporary Catholic life, tendentious in its analysis, patronizing in tone,” arguing that ultimately it “does not even rise to the level of mediocrity.”

Another critic, Dr. Samuel Gregg, observed that Father Spadaro and Rev. Figueroa demonstrate a “distinctly amateur grasp of American religious history and the finer points of American politics.”

In his analysis, Archbishop Chaput focuses on the crux of the misbegotten article: the ecumenical cooperation between U.S. Catholics and Evangelicals that unite Christians in defending traditional marriage, promoting religious liberty and standing up for human life from conception until natural death.

America’s culture wars weren’t started by people faithful to Christian belief, Chaput recalls, which makes it especially strange “when believers are attacked by their co-religionists merely for fighting for what their Churches have always held to be true.”

Progressives “tend to be wary of the religious liberty debate,” Chaput notes. Some distrust it as a “smokescreen for conservative politics,” while others see it as a “distraction from other urgent issues.”

Yet working for religious freedom “has never precluded service to the poor,” the Archbishop reminds his readers, but in fact “the liberty of religious communities has always been a seedbed of social action and ministry to those in need.”

“Foreign observers who want to criticize the United States and its religious landscape,” Chaput adds, ought to remember that modern-day ecumenism between Catholics and Evangelicals “is a function of shared concerns and principles, not ambition for political power.”

The Archbishop also makes the politically incorrect but undeniably accurate observation that the goal of much gay activism today goes beyond mere equality for the same-sex attracted and extends to a desire to “punish those who oppose the LGBT cultural agenda,” something publicly acknowledged by gay activist Tim Gill last month.

While always treating all persons with charity and justice, Chaput says, we must remember that “charity and justice can’t be severed from truth,” even when it is painful for people to hear, a point he articulated recently with great clarity and elegance.

On the other hand, dumbing down the Christian message “reduces us to useful tools” of those who would smother the faith that so many other Christians have suffered and died for, he said.

This is why groups that fight for religious liberty in our courts, legislatures, and in the public square, distinguished groups like the Alliance Defending Freedom and Becket,” Chaput said, “are heroes, not ‘haters.’”

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/07/18/philly-archbishop-decries-vatican-article-attacking-u-s-christians-as-willfully-ignorant/

Filed Under: Anti-God, Gay Mafia, Religion and Politics Tagged With: Archbishop Charles Chaput, Big Government, catholic church, ecumenism, Father Antonio Spadaro SJ, La Civiltà Cattolica, national security, religious liberty, Rev. Marcelo Figueroa, Vatican

07/19/2017 by The Doctor Of Common Sense

Man Sentenced to 132 Years in Prison for Stealing Tire Rims

The real criminals are in DC but this man will never get out of prison- all over tire rims.

Va. man sentenced to 132 years in prison for stealing tires

WASHINGTON — A jury sentenced a 38-year-old man to 132 years in prison for a series of tire and rim thefts in Loudoun County, Virginia.

In 2016, multiple victims in Loudoun County reported finding their trucks and SUVs mounted on cinder blocks in their driveways with vehicles’ tires and rims gone, according to a statement from the Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office. In several cases, police found blue fibers from what appeared to be a moving blanket attached to the blocks.

Jason Brooks, 38, was stopped in New Jersey driving a white Ford Explorer where police found cinder blocks wrapped in a blue moving blanket, a floor jack and other tools used to remove lug nuts, the statement said.

Brooks was found guilty of six counts of grand larceny, six counts of larceny with intent to sell, three counts of destruction of property and three counts of tampering with an automobile.

The jury’s verdict sentenced Brooks, who has two prior felony convictions, to a total of 132 years in prison, 63 months in jail and $6,000 in fines.

Brooks will face final sentencing in October 2017. He also faces charges on identical offenses in Fairfax County, Prince William County and New Jersey.

Va. man sentenced to 132 years in prison for stealing tires

Filed Under: Crazy Stories, Crime Tagged With: FAIRFAX COUNTY, Jason Broooks, VA NEWS LATEST NEWS LOCAL NEWS LOUDOUN COUNTY, VA NEWS PATRICK ROTH PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY, VA NEWS RIM THEFTS RIMS TIRE THEFTS TIRES VIRGINIA, Va. man sentenced to 132 years in prison for stealing tires

07/19/2017 by The Doctor Of Common Sense

OJ Parole Hearing Televised and Fuhrman Hired as Commentator For Fox

 

He needs to die. I’m tired of looking at him.

O.J. Simpson’s date with a Nevada parole board Thursday is quickly approaching national obsession status, reminiscent of his double murder trial, dubbed the Trial of the Century.

Just ask Christopher Darden, one of the prosecutors in the 1995 trial that ended with Simpson’s acquittal.

“In a way, I’m being forced to follow it. Is this the parole hearing of the century? I guess it is. People want his release. It’s hard to understand,” Darden told the Daily News on Tuesday.

“You don’t hear this much about (Charles) Manson and his parole hearings,” he said. “This is the parole hearing of the century.”

Simpson, 70, is incarcerated at Nevada’s Lovelock Correctional Facility for robbing two memorabilia dealers at a Las Vegas casino hotel back in 2007.

Prosecutors said he led a ragtag group of armed friends into the ill-fated heist. Simpson claimed he never saw a gun and only wanted to retrieve family heirlooms stolen by a former manager.

The former football star was sentenced to nine to 33 years in 2008. He has already served more than eight years and hopes the parole board will let him walk free in October.

One of his victims, collectibles broker Alfred Beardsley, died in 2015. The other, Bruce Fromong, is expected to attend the proceeding and show support for Simpson’s release.

Though he won’t be at the hearing in person, Fred Goldman, the father of murder victim Ron Goldman, told The News he wants Simpson to remain locked up.

“I’ll be following it,” Goldman said in a brief phone interview Tuesday.

Asked if he opposed Simpson’s release, Goldman said, “Absolutely, I do.”

In a nod to public fascination with Simpson’s saga, Nevada officials said the Thursday hearing will be streamed live, with a decision from the four-member board expected in a matter of hours, not the usual several days. If granted parole, Simpson could be released on Oct. 1.

Simpson’s best friend Tom Scotto told The News he planned to be in a conference room at the prison with Simpson on Thursday. Simpson will appear at the hearing via video conference.

He said the Heisman Trophy winner has been a “positive” force at Lovelock and deserves his freedom.

“There’s no reason he shouldn’t get (parole). He’s done everything right. He’s pretty much been a model prisoner,” Scotto said.

Scotto, 55, also scoffed at the announcement by Fox News that it hired disgraced cop Mark Fuhrman as a paid pundit for its on-air coverage of the hearing.

“He’s a racist and a convicted felon,” Scotto said of Fuhrman, referring to his perjury conviction for testifying that he hadn’t used the N-word in the previous 10 years. “Everyone saw he’s a racist on live TV.”

Fuhrman, 65, was a notorious figure during Simpson’s double murder trial.

He told jurors he found the bloody glove that seemed to connect Simpson to the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman, but then recordings surfaced in which he repeatedly used the N-word, and his credibility was shredded.

The veteran cop eventually pleaded no contest to felony perjury. He was sentenced to three years’ probation.

“He shouldn’t be allowed on any major news station at all,” Scotto said Tuesday. “He’s not just a convicted felon, but convicted of perjury. How can he be a serious commentator on TV, talking about any cases, let alone this one? He lied during (Simpson’s murder) trial!”

Simpson was in Vegas attending Scotto’s wedding at the time of the robbery that landed him in prison.

Fuhrman previously told The News his recorded use of the N-word didn’t reflect his true persona. He was consulting on dialogue for a movie, he said, and it was part of a dramatic character he was portraying.

“We were writing a screenplay,” he explained. “Some people say, ‘Well, you had to think those things to say them.’ Okay, I did. But I could absorb a lot of personalities and regurgitate them.”

The commissioners scheduled to quiz Simpson will be in Carson City about a two-hour drive from Simpson’s prison cell. Officials have issued more than 240 media credentials.

Simpson is expected to appear heavier and grayer than he did during his heyday as a charismatic TV pitchman, movie actor, sports commentator and inductee into the Football Hall of Fame.

Scotto said his friend is eager to resume his life on the outside.

“He wants to be near his kids,” Scotto said. “He misses his family.”

Simpson’s former lawyer Yale Galanter expects “The Juice” to be let loose, saying he has been a model prisoner with no infractions.

Galanter said that at a 2013 hearing Simpson received parole for some of his charges, including the armed robbery conviction. The parole hearing on Thursday covers the remaining counts.

The state parole board bases its decisions on points an inmate has accumulated for behavior in prison.

“Here, if you’re a model prisoner, you behave yourself, you’re not a flight risk, you get paroled,” Galanter told The News on Sunday.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/o-simpson-bid-prison-release-drawing-national-obsession-article-1.3336530

Filed Under: Crime, Entertainers and Celebrities Tagged With: Alfred Beardsley, Bruce Fromong, Christopher Darden, Fred Goldman, Mark Fuhrman, Nevada’s Lovelock Correctional Facility, O.J. Simpson’s bid for prison release drawing national obsession; ‘This is the parole hearing of the century’, OJ Parole Hearing Televised and Fuhrman Hired as Commentator For Fox, OJ Simpson, parole hearing, Tom Scotto

07/19/2017 by The Doctor Of Common Sense

Fatass Rosie D’Donnell Promotes Game That ‘Kills Trump’

She’s a dude. An ugly dude.

ctress Rosie O’Donnell certainly knows how to push conservatives’ buttons. And now she is drawing their ire by pushing her own button: one that makes President Trump jump off a cliff.

“Push Trump Off A Cliff Again,” O’Donnell tweeted Saturday in an apparent play on Trump’s “Make America Great Again” slogan. The tweet links to a game in which the player can, as O’Donnell says, make the president jump off a cliff, again and again.

Conservatives expressed outrage as O’Donnell’s weekend tweet came to their attention.

Sean Hannity’s blog referred to the game as “gross” and “sick.”

“Sadly, violence has become an acceptable form of dissent for liberals these days,” said a post on Young Conservatives. 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2017/07/19/rosie-odonnell-trump-cliff-game/490223001/

Filed Under: Anti-Trump Crowd, Donald Trump, Entertainers and Celebrities Tagged With: Donald Trump, Fatass Rosie D'Donnell Promotes Game That 'Kills Trump', Push Trump Off A Cliff Again, Rosie O'Donnell sparks outrage with Trump-killing game, Rosie O’Donnell

07/18/2017 by The Doctor Of Common Sense

Obama’s Iran Deal May Come to an End But Not For Now

No one even knows what’s in this “deal”

Obama’s Iran deal lives on – but its days are numbered

Iran-deal supporters rejoice: President Trump is signaling that his predecessor’s signature foreign-policy legacy is unassailable.

Or is he?

The Trump administration reported to Congress on Monday that Tehran is complying with the pact, just as it did back in April. Why? Two years ago, Congress passed legislation requiring the secretary of state to announce every 90 days whether he or she can say with certainty that Iran is complying.

Under President Barack Obama, certification was automatic. But Trump repeatedly promised on the campaign trail to “rip up” the deal, calling it a “disaster.”

Yet as the deal marks its two-year anniversary, Trump has for the second time certified Iranian compliance, thereby blocking Congress from imposing nuclear-related sanctions. The administration can’t start renegotiating, or telling allies it’s time to “snap back” to those international sanctions the Iran deal erased.

So the deal lives — temporarily.

According to numerous press reports, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster and Defense Secretary James Mattis won an internal debate against Special Adviser Steve Bannon, CIA Director Mike Pompeo and Trump. The latter group wanted — at the least — to say they can’t certify Iranian compliance, putting the deal in limbo and opening Iran up to nuclear sanctions without quite tearing up the whole thing.

The winning camp advised caution, reasoning that while Iran is certainly violating the deal’s spirit, it abides by its letter and raising fears of a clash with our global allies. In the end, while certifying compliance, the administration announced new sanctions on Iran for various non-nuclear offenses.

Both sides in the internal debate are right, says the Heritage Foundation’s James Carafano, who has advised Trump on world affairs during the transition period.

As Trump says, it’s a “bad deal,” Carafano told me. Yet the administration is yet to devise a “full regional strategy” to replace it. And yes, “our friends and allies clearly need to see where we’re going.”

The administration, indeed, is said to be working on an Iran policy “review” that’s due to be completed this summer. Afterwards, in three months — or six, or nine — it may well start to paint Iran’s deal violations in darker colors.

And those “marginal” violations, as they’ve been so far described, are numerous. Iran has habitually produced more uranium and heavy water than the deal allows. It has procured dual-use materiel and tested nuclear-capable missiles.

Meanwhile, Iran continues its aggressive behavior, attacking US ships in international waters and holding Americans hostage. It helps fuel regional wars in Syria, Iraq and Yemen and arms and bolsters Lebanese and Palestinian terrorists.

The reason the mullahs do all that with impunity is that we have few tools left to confront them. We gave them everything — unfrozen assets, sanctions relief — up front. All we asked in return was that they do their part — nuclear restrictions, periodic on-site inspections — during a dozen-year stretch.

So Iran could decide to just pocket those perks and walk away now, declaring that America is violating the deal. In fact, they’ve already started the process.

The smarmy Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif told CNN on Sunday that Trump is in “violation of not the spirit, but of the letter” of the deal. As the extreme anti-American wing of the all-powerful Revolutionary Guard Corps gains confidence, it may well force a collapse of the deal it’s been opposed to from the outset.

Problem is, some of our allies, and certainly China and Russia, may well buy the argument that America is at fault for the collapse.

Either way, far from the unassailable piece of state craftsmanship that the deal is widely advertised to be, Monday’s qualified certification indicates that its shaky foundations are beginning to crumble.

If so — and considering that, internal debates aside, the Trump administration is full of Iran hawks — Washington better soon start moving away from the Iran deal. It’s best we, not the mullahs or their global allies, control the process of its demise.

http://nypost.com/2017/07/18/obamas-iran-deal-lives-on-but-its-days-are-numbered/

Filed Under: Barack Obama, Donald Trump, International Politics and News, Iran, Israel, Obama Is A POS Tagged With: Barack Obama, Donald Trump, Heritage Foundation, Iran, Iran Deal, James Carafano, Javad Zarif, John Kerry, Rex Tillerson

07/18/2017 by The Doctor Of Common Sense

Do Nothing Congress Is the Least Productive in 164 Years

Drain the swamp!

 

Why the GOP Congress will be the most unproductive in 164 years

Just six months ago, it looked like the Republican Party was about to go on a legislative blitzkrieg, shredding law after law passed by the Obama administration. ObamaCare would be vaporized and replaced with a nickel rattling inside an empty Mountain Dew can. Dodd-Frank was sure to be tossed aside for a transparent giveaway to Wall Street. And Republicans would pass their regressive tax reform, their perplexing border-adjustment tax, and so much more. The GOP hadn’t held total power in American politics since 2006, and the party had become much more conservative in the interim. And instead of George W. Bush, a man who recognized at least some theoretical limits on free market fundamentalism, the new Congress would work with a sub-literate tabula rasa named Donald Trump, a man who could probably be persuaded to inject himself with experimental medication if an important-seeming person whispered “do it” in his ear.

But a funny thing happened on the way to libertarian utopia. Indeed, it turns out that the GOP-controlled Congress can’t seem to pass any meaningful laws at all. Either they have forgotten how, or the divisions in their own increasingly radicalized caucus are proving too difficult to surmount. Whatever the explanation, thus far these GOP legislators are on track to be the least productive group since at least the Civil War.

Now, okay, technically the Ryan-McConnell 115th Congress is so far actually a bit more active than recent Congresses, if you measure by the 43 laws that President Trump has adorned with his garish signature. Obama was at 40 at this point in 2009. George W. Bush had signed even fewer midway through 2001. But sheer number is not the best way to think about how much is being achieved. As The Washington Post‘s Philip Bump pointed out, a majority of the bills signed by Trump thus far have been one page long, meaning many are just symbolic or ceremonial.

Just six months ago, it looked like the Republican Party was about to go on a legislative blitzkrieg, shredding law after law passed by the Obama administration. ObamaCare would be vaporized and replaced with a nickel rattling inside an empty Mountain Dew can. Dodd-Frank was sure to be tossed aside for a transparent giveaway to Wall Street. And Republicans would pass their regressive tax reform, their perplexing border-adjustment tax, and so much more. The GOP hadn’t held total power in American politics since 2006, and the party had become much more conservative in the interim. And instead of George W. Bush, a man who recognized at least some theoretical limits on free market fundamentalism, the new Congress would work with a sub-literate tabula rasa named Donald Trump, a man who could probably be persuaded to inject himself with experimental medication if an important-seeming person whispered “do it” in his ear.

But a funny thing happened on the way to libertarian utopia. Indeed, it turns out that the GOP-controlled Congress can’t seem to pass any meaningful laws at all. Either they have forgotten how, or the divisions in their own increasingly radicalized caucus are proving too difficult to surmount. Whatever the explanation, thus far these GOP legislators are on track to be the least productive group since at least the Civil War.

Now, okay, technically the Ryan-McConnell 115th Congress is so far actually a bit more active than recent Congresses, if you measure by the 43 laws that President Trump has adorned with his garish signature. Obama was at 40 at this point in 2009. George W. Bush had signed even fewer midway through 2001. But sheer number is not the best way to think about how much is being achieved. As The Washington Post‘s Philip Bump pointed out, a majority of the bills signed by Trump thus far have been one page long, meaning many are just symbolic or ceremonial.

But you would think that this sorting would make for more coherent ideological blocs more capable of making policy when one party controls Congress and the presidency, as Republicans do now. That was surely what Republican voters expected when they woke up triumphant on Nov. 9 last year. But the divide within the Republican Party is proving to be as problematic as polarization between the parties. The ideological distance between the Senate’s most liberal member (Maine’s Susan Collins) and the most hard-right senator (Utah’s Mike Lee) is the same as the chasm between a middle-of-the-pack Democrat like Maryland’s Ben Cardin and a conservative like Iowa’s Joni Ernst.

If you want to understand how much harder it is going to be for Republicans to get anything done than it was for the Democrats in 2009-2011, your best bet is to look at this intra-Republican distance. When Democrats were toiling away on what was to become the Affordable Care Act, the total distance between the most left-wing elected Democratic senator (Bernie Sanders) and the most right-wing (Nebraska’s Ben Nelson) was barely half the size of the canyon between Susan Collins and Mike Lee. Think about that for a second.

And it’s not like Collins is alone. She’s part of a cluster of three GOP senators, along with Lisa Murkowski and Shelly Moore Capito, who are much more liberal than the rest of the caucus. (By the way, it is not a coincidence that the GOP’s three most reasonable senators are women). Moreover, Mike Lee is part of a bloc of five far-right radicals — along with Jeff Flake, Rand Paul, Ben Sasse, and Ted Cruz — who are all substantially more conservative than anyone in the Senate during Barack Obama’s first two years in office. In a sane political system, there is a zero percent chance that Mike Lee and Susan Collins would be members of the same political party.

To make matters worse, Republicans control only 52 seats in the Senate and as of yet seem unwilling to nuke the legislative filibuster (something they could do at any time by changing the rules of the Senate). Republicans no longer have conservative Democrats to lean on to get to 60 votes when their own most liberal members are beyond reach, because GOP behavior during the Obama years taught Democrats the electoral value of party unity. That means that even some very conservative pieces of legislation that have already passed the House, including the Financial CHOICE Act (H.R. 10), which guts Dodd-Frank, stand very little chance of becoming law. House leaders, including Speaker Ryan, either aren’t particularly interested in crafting bills that could actually get through the Senate or they have given up trying to forge the necessary compromises.

Or they are delusional.

The result, regardless, is that this Congress is going to be historically unproductive. How can I be so sure of this? One measure of what Congress is likely to do the rest of the year is to look at bills that have already passed the House but are awaiting action in the Senate. There are 238 of them. Amazingly, GovTrack gives only 13 a better than 50 percent chance of actually arriving on President Trump’s desk in their current form. If that holds up, Trump will have signed just 56 laws by the beginning of the 2018 congressional session. If this tortoise-like pace continues, he will preside over the least productive Congress since Millard Fillmore signed just 74 bills sent to him by the brink-of-war 32nd Congress between 1851 and 1853.

Maybe that will change. But if it doesn’t, the Republican Party’s problems are far bigger than Trump — and will probably get worse before they get better.

http://theweek.com/articles/711503/why-gop-congress-most-unproductive-164-years

Filed Under: Congress, Democrats, Republicans Tagged With: House, Mitch McConnell, Paul Ryan, Republican, Senate

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 207
  • Go to page 208
  • Go to page 209
  • Go to page 210
  • Go to page 211
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 336
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Articles

  • Dave Chappelle pretends that Republicans Twisted His Trans Jokes
  • Things You Need ID In Order To Do In America And States That Don’t Ask For ID
  • It Is Supposed To Be America First Stop Foreigners From Holding Office
  • What Really Happened To Seth Rich And Is It Connected To Hillary Emails And Fake Russian Collusion?

Donate To Free Speech

Footer


Copyright © 2026 · Workstation Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in