• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Store
  • Videos
  • Breaking News
  • Articles
  • Contact

ET Williams

The Doctor of Common Sense

Blog

12/11/2011 by The Doctor Of Common Sense

California Prison Psychologist Charged With Faking Rape

What Ever Happen To Common Sense?

SACRAMENTO,Calif.– She split her own lip with a pin, scraped her knuckles with sandpaper and had her friend punch her in the face. Investigators say she even ripped open her blouse, then wet her pants to give the appearance she had been knocked unconscious.

But it was all part of what authorities said Friday was an elaborate hoax by the woman to convince her husband she was raped so they could move to a safer neighborhood.

Charges filed by the Sacramento County district attorney allege Laurie Ann Martinez, a prison psychologist, conspired with the friend to create the appearance that she was beaten, robbed and raped by a stranger in April in her Sacramento home.

Martinez, her friend and two co-workers eventually told police the whole thing was a setup to convince Martinez’s husband that they needed to move from a blighted, high-crime area three miles north of the state Capitol.

It didn’t work. Instead, the couple filed for divorce six weeks after the April 10 incident, according to court records.

“If all you wanted to do is move, there’s other ways than staging a burglary and rape,” said Sacramento police Sgt. Andrew Pettit. “She went to great lengths to make this appear real.”

Martinez, 36, a psychologist for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, reported she had come home that day to find a stranger in her kitchen, authorities said.

“As she tried to run away, the suspect grabbed her and hit her in the face,” court records say in describing what she told police. “She lost consciousness and then when she awoke she found her pants and underwear pulled down to her ankles.”

Missing from her home were two laptop computers,Martinez’s purse, an Xbox video game console, a camera and numerous credit cards that Martinez said the stranger had stolen.

In reality, the items were all at the home of her friend, Nicole April Snyder, authorities allege. Investigators sayMartinezhad Snyder punch her in the face with boxing gloves they bought for that purpose.

Martinezbegan crying hysterically when police arrived, according to court papers.

Martinez’s two lawyers in the family court actions, Russell Carlson and Ben Ramsey, did not immediately return telephone messages seeking comment. Her husband’s attorneys in the family law case declined to comment.

Martinezwas arrested Monday and freed on $50,000 bond. There is no record that she has a criminal attorney before her arraignment set for Monday.

Snyder, 33, is charged with the same conspiracy counts, and a warrant has been issued for her arrest. Shelly Orio, a spokeswoman for the district attorney’s office, said she had no indication that Snyder has retained an attorney.

If convicted of conspiracy, each woman faces up to three years in prison, Orio said.

Police detectives and crime scene investigators spent hundreds of hours on the case, until one ofMartinez’s prison co-workers came forward to say Martinez had been talking at work about faking a crime at her home to persuade her husband to move, Pettit said.

“It doesn’t sit well for other women who really are victims, crying wolf,” Pettit said.

Martinez had been a psychologist overseeing other mental health workers treating inmates at California State Prison,Sacramento, said department spokeswoman Terry Thornton. The prison 20 miles east of Sacramento was the scene this week of a fight among more than 150 inmates that sent 11 inmates to outside hospitals.

Thornton said Martinezwas redirected to the department’s headquarters in May, when the investigation began, and has had no contact with inmates since then.Thornton said the department also is conducting its own investigation.

Martinezdid not immediately return an emailed request for comment left withThornton.

Robert Kahane, executive officer of the California Board of Psychology, said Martinez’s license currently is valid. However, “we are working diligently to ensure immediate and continued consumer protection as quickly as possible,” he said.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/12/09/california-prison-psychologist-charged-with-faking-rape/?test=latestnews#ixzz1gCQ61TZZ

 

Filed Under: Common Sense Tagged With: Common Sense, Faking Rape, Prison Psychologist, What Ever Happen To Common Sense

12/10/2011 by The Doctor Of Common Sense

Israel Air Force strike against Gaza terrorists

Gaza Bombings

JERUSALEM (JWN and agencies)—An Israel Air Force strike against Gaza terrorists on Thursday led to a rocket barrage in retaliation, followed by another round of strike and retaliation on Friday. Two terrorists and a civilian were killed and 13 Palestinian civilians were wounded in the clashes; with no Israeli casualties.

On Thursday an IAF warplane made a precision attack on a car traveling inGazaCitycontaining the two terrorists. The target of the attack was Ismail Batash, a senior member of Fatah’s Aksa Martyrs Brigades and the “Army of Believers,” an al-Qaida affiliate based in the Gaza Strip.

The IDF said the terrorists were planning to cross fromGazainto Sinai and then intoIsraelto carry out an attack. The IDF Spokesman said Batash had planned a 2007 suicide bombing whose perpetrator had crossed from Sinai into Eilat and blew himself up in a bakery, murdering three Israelis. He was also involved in planning several other attacks.

The IDF identified the second man killed as a known terrorist working in the northern Gaza Strip. The IDF statement said the two men “were affiliated with a terrorist squad that intended to attack Israeli civilians and soldiers via the western border.”

Palestinian terrorists responded to the first strike by firing a barrage of rockets deep into southernIsrael. A Grad rocket exploded in an open field near the city ofBe’er Sheva, with a Kassam rocket impacting in an open field of the Sdot Negev Regional Council. Both missiles exploded harmlessly.

In response to the barrage of eight rockets, the IAF bombed a Hamas base inGazaCityon Thursday night, killing a civilian and wounding 13 others.

Palestinian medical officials told Reuters the air strike had hit a Hamas training camp inGazaCity, sending shrapnel flying into nearby houses, killing one civilian and wounding 13 others.

The IDF Spokesman said aircraft recorded direct hits on a center of terrorist activity in southernGaza, as well as an additional terror target in northernGaza.

The IDF reiterated thatIsraelholds Hamas responsible for all terrorist activity emanating fromGazaand will continue to respond with force to attacks on Israeli citizens.

The IDF saidIsraelregrets any harm to civilians, but points out that Hamas bears direct responsibility for civilian casualties by its well known practice of storing explosives and weapons, including rockets, at targeted sites and using its own people as human shields.

The air strikes, the IDF Spokesman said, were accurate, and direct hits on the terrorist targets were recorded. The IDF statement said Hamas “chooses to operate in the heart of civilian population centers and uses human shields.”

The escalation in violence comes days afterIsrael’s Education Ministry banned school trips around the southern city ofEilat, following warnings against a possible terrorist attack on the Israel-Egypt border. All schools and youth groups were barred from the area south of Route 12, which runs along the border and was the scene of a triple terrorist attack on August 18 in which eight Israelis were murdered.

http://jerusalemworldnews.com/2011/12/09/gaza-air-strike-sets-off-round-of-retaliation/

 

Filed Under: Israel, Politics Tagged With: Gaza, Hamas, Israel, Palestinian, Sina, terrorists

12/10/2011 by The Doctor Of Common Sense

Are We Really Free in America

By: Judge Andrew Napolitano

 What if our rights didn’t come from God or from our humanity, but from the government? What if the government really thinks we’re not unique individuals with immortal souls, but just public property? What if we were only entitled to our natural rights if it pleased the government? What if our rights could be stripped away whenever the government considers us to be its enemy?

What if this could all be accomplished with the consent of the people? What if the people’s own representatives subverted the Constitution? What if the people were so afraid that they accepted the subversion? What if the government demonizes an external enemy and uses fear of that enemy to suppress our freedoms? What if people are afraid to protest?

What if the government knows this, and thus chooses enemies that are easily demonized, whether they pose real threats or not? What if threats become imminent dangers precisely because the government allowed them to happen? What if government scapegoating of an external enemy is as old as the government itself? What if the government has used scapegoating again and again to scare people into giving up their freedoms voluntarily? What if the government has relied on this to perform the same magical disappearing-freedom act time and again throughout history?

What if the government could lock you up and throw you in jail indefinitely? What if that jail was inCuba? What if the government has written laws to let it keep you detained forever without letting you see a lawyer or a judge? What if you were just speaking out against the government and it came to silence you? What if the government could declare you its enemy and then kill you? What if your elected representatives did nothing to stop the government from doing this? What if the government claimed that your words made you a warrior, even though there never were any armed hostilities in your neighborhood and you never threatened anyone? What if the government could classify the entire country as a battlefield and, ultimately, a prison? What if the government’s goal was to be rid of all who disagreed with it?

What if the real war was a war of misinformation? What if the government constructs its own reality in order to suit its own agenda? What if civil liberties don’t mean anything to the government? What if the government just chooses to allow you to exercise them freely because you don’t threaten it at the moment? What if the government released a report calling you a domestic terror threat, just because you disagreed with the government? What if the government coaxed crazy people into acting like terrorists, just to keep you afraid? What if the government persuaded you to believe that the greatest threat to your freedom is an impoverished and uneducatedThird Worldpopulation 10,000 miles away? What if the real threat to your freedom is a rich, powerful and all-seeing government? What if that government thinks it can write any law, regulate any behavior and tax any event no matter what the Constitution says?

What if the government is always the greatest threat to freedom because only the government can constitute a monopoly on the use of force? What if, in fact, at its essence, government is simply a monopoly of force? What if, in fact, at its essence, government is simply the negation of freedom? What if the government monopoly incubated, aided and abetted enemies’ freedoms? What if, when the danger got more threatening, the government told you to sacrifice more of your liberties for safety? What if you fell for that?

What if those who traded liberty for safety ended up in internment camps? What if the greatest threat to freedom was not any outfit of thugs in some cave in a far-off land, but an organized force here at home? What if that organized force broke its own laws? What if that organized force did the very same things to those it hates and fears that it prosecutes people for doing to it? What if I’m right and the government’s wrong? What if it’s dangerous to be right when the government is wrong? What if government is essentially wrong and always dangerous?

What if these weren’t just hypothetical or rhetorical questions? What if this is actually happening to us? What if the ultimate target in the government’s war on terror is all who believe in personal freedom? What if that includes YOU? What do we do about it?

 http://townhall.com/columnists/judgeandrewnapolitano/2011/12/08/what_if_freedom_were_temporary

 

 

Filed Under: Common Sense, Corruption, Hypocrisy, Uncategorized Tagged With: America, Corruption, government, Hypocrisy, scapegoating

12/09/2011 by The Doctor Of Common Sense

Black Conservative’s are lynched by the Media

BY: Ann Coulter

 With the mainstream media giddily reporting on an alleged affair involving Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain, how long can it be before they break the news that their 2004 vice presidential candidate conceived a “love child” with his mistress, Rielle Hunter?

The left is trying to destroy Cain with a miasma of hazy accusations leveled by three troubled women. Considered individually, the accusations are utterly unbelievable. They are even less credible taken together. This is how liberals destroy a man, out of nothing.

After the first round of baseless accusations against Cain, an endless stream of pundits rolled out the cliché — as if it were the height of originality — “This isn’t he said-she said; it’s he-said, she-said, she-said, she-said, she–said.”

Au contraire: We had two “she’s” and only one “said.”

Remember? Only two women were willing to give their names. And as soon as they did, we discovered that they were highly suspicious accusers with nothing more than their personal honor to support the allegations. Only one of the two would even say what Cain allegedly did.

The first one was Sharon Bialek, who claimed that Cain grabbed her crotch in a car.

Then we found out Bialek was in constant financial trouble, had been involved in a paternity lawsuit, was known as a “gold digger,” had a string of debts and had twice filed for personal bankruptcy. Also, she admitted she knew Obama’s dirty tricks specialist, David Axelrod, from living in the same building with him.

Her personal history is relevant because she produced no evidence. We had to take her word. (Which was not helped by seeing her standing with Gloria Allred.)

The second one, Karen Kraushaar, made unspecified allegations of a “hostile environment” when she was working for Cain, but refuses to say what those allegations were. This despite the fact that the National Restaurant Association waived her confidentiality agreement, thus allowing her to go public.

That’s one “she,” but no “said.”

Cain said he had once told Kraushaar she was as tall as his wife — which would be one of the more worthy sexual harassment claims settled by an American company in recent years.

Why won’t she say? We’re not talking about rape. Kraushaar can’t say, “I don’t want to relive being told I was the same height as his wife!” With all the nonsense that passes for a “hostile environment,” either Kraushaar tells us what Cain allegedly did, or her blind accusation is worth less than nothing.

 

As if that weren’t enough, then it turned out that Kraushaar had also filed a complaint at her next job just three years later, charging that a manager had circulated a sexually explicit joke email comparing computers to men and women. She demanded a raise and the right to work at home.

Maybe Kraushaar is the most unlucky woman in the world. But the simpler explanation is that she is not a credible witness on the workplace atmosphere.

And now we have Ginger White stepping forward to claim that she had a 13-year affair with Cain. Cain admits he was friends with White, but he categorically, adamantly denies having an affair with her.

White has the whole combo-platter of questionable accuser attributes: She’s another financially troubled, twice-divorced, unemployed single mother, who has claimed sexual harassment in the past, declared bankruptcy once, was accused of stalking and had a libel judgment entered against her just this year. So far in 2011, she’s had nine liens put on her property.

But we’re supposed to ignore all of that because she’s the third woman of questionable character to make an implausible allegation. Liberals say there’s a pattern, but the only pattern is of their making far-fetched accusations of a sexual nature against Cain.

White’s proof that she had a 13-year affair is that she has two of Cain’s books signed by him – one with the incriminating inscription, “Friends are forever! Everything else is a bonus,” and the other, “Miss G, you have already made a ‘big difference!’ Stay focused as you pursue your next destination.” (I know — filthy!)

If that’s proof of an affair, I’ve had thousands of them without even realizing it.

Also, White produced evidence that Cain had texted or called her cell phone 61 times during four non-consecutive months — but did not reveal what those texts said. (“Would you please return my lawn mower?”)

Again, if that’s proof of an affair, I’m having hundreds of them at this very moment.

This is the sort of evidence you get with an actual sexual predator: Bill Clinton’s accusers had gifts, taped phone conversations with him and a semen-stained dress.

Jennifer Flowers produced taped telephone calls withClintontotaling thousands of words between them, with him counseling her on how to deny their affair: “If they ever hit you with it, just say no, and go on. There’s nothing they can do … But when they — if somebody contacts you, I need to know … All you got to do is deny it.”

Paula Jones had multiple same-day witnesses – including the state troopers who worked forClintonand had already told the press about a “Paula” they brought toClinton’s hotel room. And that was for a single incident.

Monica Lewinsky had lots of gifts from Clinton, including a hat pin, two brooches, a marble bear figurine, a T-shirt from Martha’s Vineyard and Walt Whitman’s “Leaves of Grass,” all of which she mysteriously placed with Clinton’s secretary, Betty Currie, during the investigation, as well as a semen-stained dress, which Monica kept.

Ginger White claims she had a 13-year affair with Cain — and all she has are two books with inscriptions that could have been written to an auto mechanic who waited in line at a Cain book signing. Even her business partner during the alleged affair says White never mentioned Cain’s name.

These women are like triple-A ball players with the stats being: number of bankruptcies, smallest bank account, number of liens, most false claims, number of children out of wedlock, degrees of separation from David Axelrod, total trips to human resources and so on.

That wouldn’t be dispositive — except for the fact that their only evidence is their word.

But this is how liberals dirty you up when they’ve got nothing: They launch a series of false accusations, knowing that Americans with busy lives won’t follow each story to the end and notice that they were all blind alleys.

The liberal media is an old story, but it’s still a big story when it comes to creating the impression of scandal out of thin air.

Most people say, “Where there’s smoke, there’s fire.” I say, “Where there’s smoke around a conservative, there are journalists furiously rubbing two sticks together.”

 http://townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/2011/11/30/once_you_go_conservative_black,_you_better_watch_your_back  

 

Filed Under: Hypocrisy, Uncategorized Tagged With: Conservative, Ginger White, Herman Cain, Karen Kraushaar, Media, Monica Lewinsky, Republican, Sharon Bialek, What Ever Happen To Common Sense

12/07/2011 by The Doctor Of Common Sense

Theodore Roosevelt Policies

 

We Want Socialism

 

 

1901–1909: Domestic Policies

On the domestic front, President Roosevelt was one of the most visible Progressives of his time. Many of his domestic policies involved fighting big industry and corruption in an attempt to help the common man. He offered the American people a Square Deal to improve their standard of living and exert more control over large domineering corporations or trusts. Trusts, which were technically illegal under the 1890 Sherman Act, attempted to consolidate business interests to create a monopoly on specific products and eliminate competition. Many businesses attackedRooseveltas a socialist, but he ardently refuted these accusations and refuted the principles of Marxism. In truth,Roosevelt did not despise big business, and in fact realized that the trusts had indirectly increased the standard of living for nearly every American in the latter half of the nineteenth century.Rooseveltdid, however, dislike the power of the trusts and the fact that the American public had little control of them. On the other hand, however, he also feared giving too much power to labor. His Square Deal policies attempted to strike a balance between the two.

Roosevelt’s first major domestic test as President came when 140,000 miners in easternPennsylvania went on strike in the 1902 Coal Strike. Coal was a vital energy source for almost all Americans during this era, and the nation panicked during the strike. Represented by John Mitchell, the miners formed the United Mine Workers Union to demand higher wages and better working conditions. The president of the Philadelphia and Reading Railroad Company and owner of the mine, George Baer, would not concede to the strikers’ demands. Mitchell approached Roosevelt and asked him to establish an independent arbitration council. Baer–and, ironically, even the miners themselves–refused arbitration.Roosevelt, under pressure from Republicans and the American citizenry and not even considering the legality of his actions, planned to replace the strikers by force with ten thousand Army troops and begin mining coal again if a settlement could not be reached. Fortunately, Secretary of War Elihu Root was able to avert a disaster. Working with banker J.P. Morgan, Root was able to convince the miners to accept independent arbitration.Roosevelt won the American people’s approval of the way he handled the situation.

Also in 1902, President Roosevelt shocked financiers on Wall Street with his decision to approve the government’s lawsuit against Northern Securities, a large and recently merged western railroad company, for violating the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. J.P. Morgan, the financier who had arranged the merger and who had significant amounts of money invested in Northern Securities, took Roosevelt’s decision as a personal insult. Many conservative Republicans in Congress and bankers on Wall Street attacked the President and Attorney General Philander Knox for the decision. The American people, one the other hand, loved Roosevelt for his boldness in the face of the trusts. To ensure the government’s victory,Roosevelt also nominated Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., to replace Justice Horace Gray on the Supreme Court. As Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Court, Holmes had voted against industry and railroads in similar suits, making him the perfect choice from Roosevelt’s perspective. In the end, theU.S.government won the suit, Northern Securities was dismantled into smaller companies, and President Roosevelt came to be known as the “Trustbuster.”

As the Sherman Act had never been truly enforced until this time, the breakup of Northern Securities opened the floodgate for suits against other major trusts. Famous among these was Roosevelt’s “busting” of the Standard Oil trust. Muckraker Ida Tarbell’s History of Standard Oil, which was published in McClure magazine, detailed the business practices of Rockefeller’s oil machine. Tarbell accused Standard Oil of issuing rebates in total of one million dollars to its customers to effectively eliminate competition. In 1906,Roosevelt had the Hepburn Bill drafted and passed through Congress to reform rate evaluations and outlaw excessive rebates designed to thwart competitors. The bill also stipulated that all companies engaged in interstate commerce were under the supervision of the federal government. The bill hurt not only Standard Oil but the powerful rebate-issuing railroads as well. In all,Roosevelt brought lawsuits against forty-three other trusts during his Presidency.

In 1907, financial troubles hit the United States when the Knickerbocker Trust Company in New York failed, leading to a cascade effect that caused many other banks to totter as well. Conservative Republicans blamedRooseveltfor the economic distress, claiming that his actions had undermined stability and shattered consumer confidence.Roosevelt shot back that it was the plutocracy that caused the troubles. Although it was impossible to discern at the time, the rest of the world was suffering as well, and the Panic of 1907 was neither the result of Roosevelt’s policies or the plutocrats’ business practices. When the large brokerage of Moore and Schley nearly collapsed, J.P. Morgan once again met with the President. Moore and Schley held five million dollars of stock in the Tennessee Coal and Iron Company that it could not convert to cash to pay its investors. Morgan suggested that financially sound U.S. Steel Company purchase the Tennessee Coal and Iron Company, validating its stock, and thus stabilize Moore and Schley. This plan would work so long asRooseveltapproved the merger and promised not to declare it a violation of the Sherman Act.Roosevelt consented, U.S. Steel purchased Tennessee Coal and Iron, and as a result the stock market did not collapse. Together, Roosevelt and Morgan successfully avoided a widespread economic depression.

Upton Sinclair’s 1906 novel The Jungle, which graphically depicted the horrible working conditions of theChicago stockyards and meatpacking industry, spurredRoosevelt to make other reforms. The President was especially disgusted by Sinclair’s apparently fact-based account of a machinist who fell into a meat grinder and emerged as canned meat to be sold and eaten. Roosevelt called for immediate action and organized an investigation into the packing houses in Chicago and other cities. The details of the report turned out to be not far from Sinclair’s fictional account. An outraged public cry for action quickly produced the Meat Inspection Bill and later the creation of the Food and Drug Administration.

 Another major component of Roosevelt’s domestic policy was conservation, stemming from his great love of the outdoors. After having toured the nation on several campaign trips, including stints in California, thePacific Northwest, and the Southwest, the president determined to conserve as much land as possible.Roosevelt’s idea of conservation was groundbreaking–at the time, the idea of conserving the land primarily meant not preservation, but merely saving the land for future generations to use later. For this reason, most of the conserved land at that point was forest that provided valuable timber. During his administrations,Roosevelt purchased 150 acres of land to conserve.Rooseveltalso consorted with many prominent conservationists of the time, such as Gifford Pinchot and John Muir, and established many wildlife preservations along with them. The National Forest Service was organized and additional National Parks were set aside throughout theU.S.for recreation and conservation purposes. Such acts faced opposition from many members of Congress and Western settlers who had plans to use the land that was being set aside. Settlers were, however, pleased with the 1902 Reclamation Act that set aside money to irrigate previously dry and unlivable tracts of land.

 http://www.sparknotes.com/biography/troosevelt/section10.rhtml

 

Filed Under: White House Tagged With: Corruption, Obama, Theodore Roosevelt, What Ever Happen To Common Sense, White House

12/07/2011 by The Doctor Of Common Sense

Obama is Channeling Theodore Roosevelt and that’s not good

We will keep trying it no matter how many times it fails.

“Roosevelt Was A Socialist Also” Please see Theodore Roosevelt’s Policies On The Next Post

By David Nakamura

Having failed to transcend ugly partisan politics in the here and now, President Obama has resorted instead to trying on different personas of presidents past in an attempt to rise above his Republican rivals.

During an address to Congress this summer, he quoted GOP icon Ronald Reagan to show that his plan to tax the wealthy to reduce the deficit was one that Republican heroes had once embraced.

On Labor Day, Obama appeared in Detroitand invoked Harry Truman’s visit on the same holiday decades earlier to launch a more pugilistic tone against his Republican opponents

On Tuesday, Obama will speak in Osawatomie, Kan., the same Midwestern town where, 101 years ago, Theodore Roosevelt gave a famous address trumpeting a new progressive agenda.

By arguing that every American deserves “a fair shot and a fair shake,” White House aides said, Obama will echoRoosevelt’s speech laying out his New Nationalism philosophy.

Rooseveltwas calling for a government that ensures that the welfare of ordinary residents trumps that of businesses and special interests. It’s an argument that builds on Obama’s jobs tour, in which he has attempted to cast himself as a champion of the middle class and accused Republicans of working only to protect the interests of the wealthy.

Last week, in an appearance in Scranton, Pa., Obama went so far as to question the GOP’s core values. (Republicans have countered that it is the Obama administration’s failed economic policies, such as the massive federal stimulus package in 2009, that have stymied a robust economic recovery.)

Obama’s address in Osawatomie aims to “put into broader perspective the kind of debates we’ve been having to build an economic future in this country,” White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said Monday.

“It’s abundantly clear, and was clear even prior to this most recent economic crisis,” Carney added, “that the middle class in this country has been squeezed for a long time, and most especially in the last decade. . . prior to this president coming into office.”

Rooseveltgave his New Nationalism speech after finishing two terms in office. Frustrated with the stout conservatism of his hand-picked replacement, William Howard Taft, Roosevelt sought to press a more progressive agenda that would regulate corporations and the railroad industry, extend food and drug protections and provide federal assistance to the poor and middle-class, said Allan Lichtman, distinguished professor of American History at American University.

“It was a crystallizing speech that did what Obama wants to do, which is throw down the gauntlet,” Lichtman said. Having identified with Abraham Lincoln during his inauguration and now withRoosevelt, Lichtman added, Obama is “trying to show how far the Republican Party has strayed, trying to draw a contrast between a narrow, cramped, corporate Republican party and the party of Lincoln and Roosevelt that sought liberty and represented ordinary people.”

Historian Doris Kearns Goodwin, in an appearance on Meet the Press two weeks ago, suggested that the president channelRoosevelt. But senior administration officials said Monday that Goodwin did not influence Obama’s decision to appear in Osawatomie.

The officials cited still other Republican presidents who took actions that current Republicans might balk at — Richard Nixon starting the Environmental Protection Agency, Dwight Eisenhower expanding the federal highway system — to highlight the stakes facing the country.

Roosevelt“was criticized by members of his party,” said one administration official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to lay out White House strategy. “That’s why he ultimately left his party and gave the speech. . .We’re at a crossroads here.”

 http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/44/post/obama-invokes-theodore-roosevelt-in-latest-bid-to-defeat-gop/2011/12/05/gIQARwwsYO_blog.html

 

 

Filed Under: Common Sense, Corruption, Idiots, No Common Sense Tagged With: Common Sense, Corruption, Obama, Socialism, Theodore Roosevelt, White House

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 320
  • Go to page 321
  • Go to page 322
  • Go to page 323
  • Go to page 324
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 336
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Articles

  • It Is Supposed To Be America First Stop Foreigners From Holding Office
  • What Really Happened To Seth Rich And Is It Connected To Hillary Emails And Fake Russian Collusion?
  • Will “Big Tish” Leticia James Go To Prison For Mortgage Fraud?
  • Women Hit With A Bowling Ball

Donate To Free Speech

Footer


Copyright © 2025 · Workstation Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in